AI Engineering Hub: Coding Agent Operations and Verification

A hub for making AI coding agents more repeatable through harness design, context control, verification, permissions, and security boundaries.

This page treats AI coding agents as operational systems, not just prompt targets. It organizes existing posts by the problem a reader is trying to solve.

Problems Covered Here

  • Codex or Claude Code gives different results for similar requests.
  • AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md keep growing without a clear boundary.
  • Long logs, plans, and memory consume the context budget.
  • Build and test pass, but agent work still needs a verification loop.
  • MCP, hooks, settings, permissions, approvals, and guardrails need security boundaries.

Short Answer

Reliable agent work comes from separating responsibilities: task request, instruction file, config, tool permissions, trace, and validation loop. Keep always-on documents short, move repeated procedures into templates or skills, and use settings, permissions, hooks, and CI for enforceable boundaries.

Core Concepts

Reading Order

  1. Why Do AI Coding Tools Produce Different Results?
  2. What Is Harness Engineering?
  3. Project Instruction Files Should Not Be Control Planes
  4. How to Write AGENTS.md for Codex
  5. Why Token Management Matters in Harness Engineering
  6. Build and Test Are Not Enough to Validate an Agent

Problem-Based Paths

When Codex results keep drifting

When AGENTS.md is unclear

When context and token pressure grow

When agent output needs verification

When MCP, hooks, and permissions need boundaries

Practical Templates

  • AI agent operations templates
  • Includes a minimal AGENTS.md, minimal CLAUDE.md, Codex task request prompt, agent work review checklist, and Claude Code permissions/settings checklist.